<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was publishing John Stuart Mill&#8217;s On Liberty a mistake?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewnorton.info/2006/09/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/09/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/</link>
	<description>Observations from Carlton's Lone Classical Liberal</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bpizaq zvptxlsgh</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/09/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-27704</link>
		<dc:creator>bpizaq zvptxlsgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2006/09/23/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/#comment-27704</guid>
		<description>qxry tlqmjxozg mnxbzw pimab krptf aytxlzn hmefpvx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>qxry tlqmjxozg mnxbzw pimab krptf aytxlzn hmefpvx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sinclair Davidson</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/09/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Sinclair Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2006/09/23/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/#comment-290</guid>
		<description>Much quoted (as a perjoritive) and little read. Okay, then I agree, nothing of importance was published in the 19 century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much quoted (as a perjoritive) and little read. Okay, then I agree, nothing of importance was published in the 19 century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Norton</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/09/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2006/09/23/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/#comment-289</guid>
		<description>Sinclair - I'm slightly embarrassed to admit that I have no memory of reading any of Spencer's books, but the fact that this is the first time I have been caught out on this omission I think says something about Spencer's contemporary status. Perhaps some of Spencer's ideas survive (and at least one famous phrase) but his books are rarely cited in contemporary debates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sinclair - I&#8217;m slightly embarrassed to admit that I have no memory of reading any of Spencer&#8217;s books, but the fact that this is the first time I have been caught out on this omission I think says something about Spencer&#8217;s contemporary status. Perhaps some of Spencer&#8217;s ideas survive (and at least one famous phrase) but his books are rarely cited in contemporary debates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sinclair Davidson</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/09/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Sinclair Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2006/09/23/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/#comment-288</guid>
		<description>"It</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Norton</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/09/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 03:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2006/09/23/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/#comment-287</guid>
		<description>William - I will put that on my list of 13 biggest mistakes made on the blog. Corrected now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William - I will put that on my list of 13 biggest mistakes made on the blog. Corrected now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bring Back EP at LP</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/09/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Bring Back EP at LP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 03:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2006/09/23/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/#comment-286</guid>
		<description>I guess in Winter he would be an Ice Berg and when pigs were flying a hamberger!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess in Winter he would be an Ice Berg and when pigs were flying a hamberger!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Bowe</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/09/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 03:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2006/09/23/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/#comment-285</guid>
		<description>Sadly, the Reid government ended 100 years earlier than your post would have us believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, the Reid government ended 100 years earlier than your post would have us believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Norton</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/09/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2006/09/23/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/#comment-284</guid>
		<description>As I have noted on Damien's blog, the &lt;I&gt;IPA Review&lt;/i&gt; does not expressly say that &lt;i&gt;On Liberty&lt;/i&gt; should have been banned, but it provides an argument that a book banner could use - just as Mill unintentionally gave respectability to Victorian protectionists. On this logic, there is an argument for banning the &lt;i&gt;IPA Review&lt;/i&gt; as well, as it may in future give respectability to book banners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I have noted on Damien&#8217;s blog, the <i>IPA Review</i> does not expressly say that <i>On Liberty</i> should have been banned, but it provides an argument that a book banner could use - just as Mill unintentionally gave respectability to Victorian protectionists. On this logic, there is an argument for banning the <i>IPA Review</i> as well, as it may in future give respectability to book banners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Eldridge</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/09/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Eldridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 15:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2006/09/23/was-publishing-john-stuart-mills-on-liberty-a-mistake/#comment-283</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

I have posted some comments on this at the following site:

http://economicsgeek.blogspot.com/2006/09/newsflash-ipa-dont-believe-in-liberty.html.

I wonder whether the IPA are aware that banning a book is a rather anthema to most liberals (especially if the book does not advocate violence or describe in explicit detail how to hurt other people)?

Regards,

Damien.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>I have posted some comments on this at the following site:</p>
<p><a href="http://economicsgeek.blogspot.com/2006/09/newsflash-ipa-dont-believe-in-liberty.html" rel="nofollow">http://economicsgeek.blogspot.com/2006/09/newsflash-ipa-dont-believe-in-liberty.html</a>.</p>
<p>I wonder whether the IPA are aware that banning a book is a rather anthema to most liberals (especially if the book does not advocate violence or describe in explicit detail how to hurt other people)?</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Damien.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
