<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do personal political attacks work?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewnorton.info/2006/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/</link>
	<description>Observations from Carlton's Lone Classical Liberal</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: camaro 2000</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/comment-page-1/#comment-1948</link>
		<dc:creator>camaro 2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 19:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2006/11/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/#comment-1948</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;camaro 2000...&lt;/strong&gt;

Search results for 'camaro 2000'....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>camaro 2000&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Search results for &#8216;camaro 2000&#8242;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: free hardcore teen picture</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/comment-page-1/#comment-1949</link>
		<dc:creator>free hardcore teen picture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2006/11/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/#comment-1949</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;free hardcore teen picture...&lt;/strong&gt;

Latest free hardcore teen picture news...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>free hardcore teen picture&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Latest free hardcore teen picture news&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sacha</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/comment-page-1/#comment-1947</link>
		<dc:creator>Sacha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2006/11/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/#comment-1947</guid>
		<description>Jacques - it feels on the mark to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacques - it feels on the mark to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques Chester</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/comment-page-1/#comment-1946</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques Chester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2006/11/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/#comment-1946</guid>
		<description>typo!  "they have" was meant to be "they would have".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>typo!  &#8220;they have&#8221; was meant to be &#8220;they would have&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques Chester</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/comment-page-1/#comment-1945</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques Chester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2006/11/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/#comment-1945</guid>
		<description>Sacha;

It's not really my analysis. It's my understanding of basic public choice and voting system theory.

I would say of negative advertising that it can win elections. More correctly, it can deny median voters to the other party. It's just not as necessary or effective in our system as it is in the US; and besides, Andrew has already noted our stricter defamation laws.

Borrowing from psychology, I'd say that even if people hate attack ads, it still works on their thinking at some level. However if the pollies listened more closely to the shrinks, they have attack ads with lots of pictures of the opponent and a "boo track", or perhaps some select vox pop. The opinions of others is a powerful psychological effect on the undecided.

Still, I would also be interested in work on the effect of  attack ads</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sacha;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not really my analysis. It&#8217;s my understanding of basic public choice and voting system theory.</p>
<p>I would say of negative advertising that it can win elections. More correctly, it can deny median voters to the other party. It&#8217;s just not as necessary or effective in our system as it is in the US; and besides, Andrew has already noted our stricter defamation laws.</p>
<p>Borrowing from psychology, I&#8217;d say that even if people hate attack ads, it still works on their thinking at some level. However if the pollies listened more closely to the shrinks, they have attack ads with lots of pictures of the opponent and a &#8220;boo track&#8221;, or perhaps some select vox pop. The opinions of others is a powerful psychological effect on the undecided.</p>
<p>Still, I would also be interested in work on the effect of  attack ads</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sacha</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/comment-page-1/#comment-1944</link>
		<dc:creator>Sacha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2006/11/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/#comment-1944</guid>
		<description>Jacques, I agree with your analysis. I wonder what the effect of personal attack ads in the Victorian compulsory voting and compulsory preferential system is? Perhaps political scientists could examine Qld and NSW state elections for any evidence about the impact of attack ads in compulsory voting OPV systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacques, I agree with your analysis. I wonder what the effect of personal attack ads in the Victorian compulsory voting and compulsory preferential system is? Perhaps political scientists could examine Qld and NSW state elections for any evidence about the impact of attack ads in compulsory voting OPV systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques Chester</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/comment-page-1/#comment-1943</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques Chester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 06:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2006/11/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/#comment-1943</guid>
		<description>Sacha;

The interaction of instant runoff votes (ie preferential voting) and compulsory voting interact to reduce the incentives for mudslinging quite substantially.

Whereas US electoral strategy is built around motivating your own voters and demoralising your opponent's, Australian electoral strategy is built around capturing the median voter.

This is because:

1. Our system requires everyone to vote, increasing the proportion of median voters to fringe position voters, and
2. Fringe position votes percolate through preferences to a major party anyhow, which means that major parties can safely ignore any fringe.

Note that 2. breaks in optional preferential systems like Queensland's, and without 1., the overall system becomes much less effective. This is why I support compulsory, exhaustive preferential voting schemes. It's a loss of freedom in an absolute sense, but it acts as a centralising, normalising force on politics in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sacha;</p>
<p>The interaction of instant runoff votes (ie preferential voting) and compulsory voting interact to reduce the incentives for mudslinging quite substantially.</p>
<p>Whereas US electoral strategy is built around motivating your own voters and demoralising your opponent&#8217;s, Australian electoral strategy is built around capturing the median voter.</p>
<p>This is because:</p>
<p>1. Our system requires everyone to vote, increasing the proportion of median voters to fringe position voters, and<br />
2. Fringe position votes percolate through preferences to a major party anyhow, which means that major parties can safely ignore any fringe.</p>
<p>Note that 2. breaks in optional preferential systems like Queensland&#8217;s, and without 1., the overall system becomes much less effective. This is why I support compulsory, exhaustive preferential voting schemes. It&#8217;s a loss of freedom in an absolute sense, but it acts as a centralising, normalising force on politics in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sacha</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/comment-page-1/#comment-1942</link>
		<dc:creator>Sacha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2006/11/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/#comment-1942</guid>
		<description>I read/heard somewhere that in the US, attack ads are used to depress the votes of your opponents. I think this was mentioned just before the recent mid-terms, and in the story I read it was said that some people thought that the revelation that George W. Bush had been caught drink-driving (from memory) a few days before the election depressed his vote a little.

Perhaps the same is true here, although the compulsory nature of voting might make it more likely for attack ads to depress first preference votes rather than two party preferred, at a guess. Perhaps the votes for minor parties and independents would increase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read/heard somewhere that in the US, attack ads are used to depress the votes of your opponents. I think this was mentioned just before the recent mid-terms, and in the story I read it was said that some people thought that the revelation that George W. Bush had been caught drink-driving (from memory) a few days before the election depressed his vote a little.</p>
<p>Perhaps the same is true here, although the compulsory nature of voting might make it more likely for attack ads to depress first preference votes rather than two party preferred, at a guess. Perhaps the votes for minor parties and independents would increase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Norton</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/comment-page-1/#comment-1941</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2006/11/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/#comment-1941</guid>
		<description>Overall, the US has a weaker party system than here, and weaker libel laws, both of which have contributed to the rise of mud-slinging. I think you are probably right that US politics is more polarised than here, which is partly a function of voluntary voting, which means that you need to mobilise your base more than appealing to people with weak ideological views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall, the US has a weaker party system than here, and weaker libel laws, both of which have contributed to the rise of mud-slinging. I think you are probably right that US politics is more polarised than here, which is partly a function of voluntary voting, which means that you need to mobilise your base more than appealing to people with weak ideological views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2006/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/comment-page-1/#comment-1940</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2006/11/11/are-the-victorian-dirt-campaigns-working/#comment-1940</guid>
		<description>It is interesting that in the US elections Americans are said to usually vote for the man not the party, but in the mideterm election they voted for the party (and the policy) rather than the man. Or, more precisely, against a policy and a party. I would say that at least at the moment the two parties in the US are more divided by real policy issues than in Australia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting that in the US elections Americans are said to usually vote for the man not the party, but in the mideterm election they voted for the party (and the policy) rather than the man. Or, more precisely, against a policy and a party. I would say that at least at the moment the two parties in the US are more divided by real policy issues than in Australia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
