<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is dissent being &#8217;silenced&#8217; in Australia?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewnorton.info/2007/01/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2007/01/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/</link>
	<description>Observations from Carlton's Lone Classical Liberal</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Davies</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2007/01/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4419</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 04:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2007/01/27/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4419</guid>
		<description>Sacha, in the same vein as Earth, can I just point out that the reelection of the Howard government is all the proof you need that dissent is being stifled -- if it wasn't how could the electorate be hoodwinked into voting for them, despite their dissent stifling ways?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sacha, in the same vein as Earth, can I just point out that the reelection of the Howard government is all the proof you need that dissent is being stifled &#8212; if it wasn&#8217;t how could the electorate be hoodwinked into voting for them, despite their dissent stifling ways?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Smith</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2007/01/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4418</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2007/01/27/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4418</guid>
		<description>I read your review, Allan. Big on rhetoric, vague and unsubstantiated accusations.

When whining lefties write about the crushing of dissent in Australia, I think of people like Armando Valaderes, who suffered torture in Cubas gulag system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read your review, Allan. Big on rhetoric, vague and unsubstantiated accusations.</p>
<p>When whining lefties write about the crushing of dissent in Australia, I think of people like Armando Valaderes, who suffered torture in Cubas gulag system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Smith</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2007/01/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4417</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2007/01/27/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4417</guid>
		<description>Dr Colin Keay, a retired professor of Physics at U. of Newcastle, has spent a lot of time and money dealing with the anti-nuclear propaganda of people like Christina Macpherson. He has not attracted great media attention. Yet no-one is claiming that he is being "silenced" or "oppressed".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Colin Keay, a retired professor of Physics at U. of Newcastle, has spent a lot of time and money dealing with the anti-nuclear propaganda of people like Christina Macpherson. He has not attracted great media attention. Yet no-one is claiming that he is being &#8220;silenced&#8221; or &#8220;oppressed&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allan boyd</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2007/01/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4416</link>
		<dc:creator>allan boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2007/01/27/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4416</guid>
		<description>SILENCING DISSENT - Book Review

"Silencing Dissent is an appropriate book for an appropriate era. At a time of increasing cultural homogeneity, collective apathy and lack of community participation in Australia, this book examines how for over ten years, John Howard's conservative Liberal-Coalition government has employed intimidation, deceit, obfuscation and conspiracy to silence and ridicule those who seek to dissent its policies.

Silencing Dissent reveals how our Australian democratic institutions, both government and NGOs are being eroded. The very heart of public participation has defected - and this book shows how and why. In John Howard's Australia in 2007, by contributing to the book - each Silencing Dissent contributor is a radical dissident..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SILENCING DISSENT - Book Review</p>
<p>&#8220;Silencing Dissent is an appropriate book for an appropriate era. At a time of increasing cultural homogeneity, collective apathy and lack of community participation in Australia, this book examines how for over ten years, John Howard&#8217;s conservative Liberal-Coalition government has employed intimidation, deceit, obfuscation and conspiracy to silence and ridicule those who seek to dissent its policies.</p>
<p>Silencing Dissent reveals how our Australian democratic institutions, both government and NGOs are being eroded. The very heart of public participation has defected - and this book shows how and why. In John Howard&#8217;s Australia in 2007, by contributing to the book - each Silencing Dissent contributor is a radical dissident&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derrida derider</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2007/01/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4415</link>
		<dc:creator>derrida derider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2007/01/27/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4415</guid>
		<description>In the long run hyperbole tends to harm a case rather help it, and this book is a good example.  Not that hyperbole is limited to the left (the "threat" from Iraq, anyone?).

And Ken's right - the government spends a lot of its time agenda-setting.  It tries to move the goalposts rather than actively preventing critics' goalkicks. Though just the same, Andrew, if you take any paid consultancies from this lot make sure the story you publicly tell is the one the government wants told.

Also, just because things like the Hicks case are not the norm doesn't mean we shouldn't get angry about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the long run hyperbole tends to harm a case rather help it, and this book is a good example.  Not that hyperbole is limited to the left (the &#8220;threat&#8221; from Iraq, anyone?).</p>
<p>And Ken&#8217;s right - the government spends a lot of its time agenda-setting.  It tries to move the goalposts rather than actively preventing critics&#8217; goalkicks. Though just the same, Andrew, if you take any paid consultancies from this lot make sure the story you publicly tell is the one the government wants told.</p>
<p>Also, just because things like the Hicks case are not the norm doesn&#8217;t mean we shouldn&#8217;t get angry about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Lovell</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2007/01/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4414</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Lovell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2007/01/27/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4414</guid>
		<description>I suspect that most activist political groups would like to stifle dissent but lack the means, whereas governments have the means (to a degree) but generally resist the inclination to do it. There may be some exceptions where individual ministers blur the distinction between their political and executive functions and from my experience this was certainly the case under the Hawke/Keating Governments. I'm sure the Howard Government isn't immune either but to call it 'silencing' dissent is over the top.

There are also instances of governments restricting access to information which have the effect of making dissent more difficult because of a shortage of relevant data. One example is the collection of regulations that prevent access to the content of Australian Workplace Agreements, thereby ensuring that public discussion depends on anecdotes and assertions instead of methodical research.

What is much more concerning is governments drowning out dissent with media manipulation and paid advertising. When this happens it's not a matter of actively suppressing dissent but of manufacturing such a lot of noise somewhere else that dissenting voices aren't heard. I believe that kind of opinion-management has become more prevalent over the last 20 years, again with both sides of politics being equally culpable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that most activist political groups would like to stifle dissent but lack the means, whereas governments have the means (to a degree) but generally resist the inclination to do it. There may be some exceptions where individual ministers blur the distinction between their political and executive functions and from my experience this was certainly the case under the Hawke/Keating Governments. I&#8217;m sure the Howard Government isn&#8217;t immune either but to call it &#8217;silencing&#8217; dissent is over the top.</p>
<p>There are also instances of governments restricting access to information which have the effect of making dissent more difficult because of a shortage of relevant data. One example is the collection of regulations that prevent access to the content of Australian Workplace Agreements, thereby ensuring that public discussion depends on anecdotes and assertions instead of methodical research.</p>
<p>What is much more concerning is governments drowning out dissent with media manipulation and paid advertising. When this happens it&#8217;s not a matter of actively suppressing dissent but of manufacturing such a lot of noise somewhere else that dissenting voices aren&#8217;t heard. I believe that kind of opinion-management has become more prevalent over the last 20 years, again with both sides of politics being equally culpable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafe</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2007/01/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4413</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2007/01/27/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4413</guid>
		<description>As someone else suggested, people who are concerned about the threat to freedoms in Australia need to do &lt;a href="http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan/museum/faqframe.htm"&gt;some homework.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone else suggested, people who are concerned about the threat to freedoms in Australia need to do <a href="http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan/museum/faqframe.htm">some homework.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bannerman</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2007/01/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4412</link>
		<dc:creator>Bannerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 05:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2007/01/27/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4412</guid>
		<description>Seriously, Andrew, is it a crime now to highlight the failings of a clearly authoritarian government which is completely out of touch with the electorate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, Andrew, is it a crime now to highlight the failings of a clearly authoritarian government which is completely out of touch with the electorate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sacha</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2007/01/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4411</link>
		<dc:creator>Sacha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 04:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2007/01/27/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4411</guid>
		<description>Christina, and many environmental scientists around the world support nuclear power obtained from the fission of uranium (eg Lovelock). These things are not so straightforward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christina, and many environmental scientists around the world support nuclear power obtained from the fission of uranium (eg Lovelock). These things are not so straightforward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sacha</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2007/01/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4410</link>
		<dc:creator>Sacha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 04:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2007/01/27/is-dissent-being-silenced-in-australia/#comment-4410</guid>
		<description>"Since the introduction of Howar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Since the introduction of Howar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
