<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Campaigns versus personal experience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewnorton.info/2007/03/campaigns-versus-personal-experience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2007/03/campaigns-versus-personal-experience/</link>
	<description>Observations from Carlton's Lone Classical Liberal</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leopold</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2007/03/campaigns-versus-personal-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-6238</link>
		<dc:creator>Leopold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2007/03/26/campaigns-versus-personal-experience/#comment-6238</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20876,21493330-17281,00.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Newspoll today&lt;/a&gt; on IR.

A curious difference between Newspoll and ACN on this topic - 33% of Newspoll respondents reckon they are worse off under WorkChoices. And 'a lot worse off' is rising in Newspoll, while in ACN the overall figure 'worse off' is falling.

The age distribution is however interesting - 44% of those under 35 (who vote Labor anyway) while only about 25% of those in older age groups. People aged over 35 are also more likely to believe the changes are good for jobs and the economy, particularly the 35-49 age group.

Am I right in thinking 35-49 is usually the key swing demographic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20876,21493330-17281,00.html" rel="nofollow">Newspoll today</a> on IR.</p>
<p>A curious difference between Newspoll and ACN on this topic - 33% of Newspoll respondents reckon they are worse off under WorkChoices. And &#8216;a lot worse off&#8217; is rising in Newspoll, while in ACN the overall figure &#8216;worse off&#8217; is falling.</p>
<p>The age distribution is however interesting - 44% of those under 35 (who vote Labor anyway) while only about 25% of those in older age groups. People aged over 35 are also more likely to believe the changes are good for jobs and the economy, particularly the 35-49 age group.</p>
<p>Am I right in thinking 35-49 is usually the key swing demographic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Norton</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2007/03/campaigns-versus-personal-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-6236</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 04:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2007/03/26/campaigns-versus-personal-experience/#comment-6236</guid>
		<description>Rajat - I had &lt;a href="http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2007/01/04/could-workchoices-affect-the-2007-election/" rel="nofollow"&gt;a post&lt;/a&gt; on this topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rajat - I had <a href="http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2007/01/04/could-workchoices-affect-the-2007-election/" rel="nofollow">a post</a> on this topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajat Sood</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2007/03/campaigns-versus-personal-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-6241</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajat Sood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2007/03/26/campaigns-versus-personal-experience/#comment-6241</guid>
		<description>But isn't it typically the case that most people vote on the basis of hip pocket or security reasons rather than on the basis of principle? Is there solid evidence of an "issue cycle" that is distinct from the economic cycle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But isn&#8217;t it typically the case that most people vote on the basis of hip pocket or security reasons rather than on the basis of principle? Is there solid evidence of an &#8220;issue cycle&#8221; that is distinct from the economic cycle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Argy</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2007/03/campaigns-versus-personal-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-6240</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Argy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2007/03/26/campaigns-versus-personal-experience/#comment-6240</guid>
		<description>You are very clinical in your anlaysis of polls, Andrew. Well done.

I never expected Work Choices to affect more than 10 to 15% of workers - at least at least at this stage of the economic cycle. Even 21% saying they will be worse off seems surprisingly high - but it is declining, as you say.

I think the message from the iR polls is that people do care a great deal about a law that threatens their relatives or friends or their sense of 'fairness' - even when they themselves do not expect to be worse off. It could affect their vote - unless Howard can convince them that their jobs are at risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are very clinical in your anlaysis of polls, Andrew. Well done.</p>
<p>I never expected Work Choices to affect more than 10 to 15% of workers - at least at least at this stage of the economic cycle. Even 21% saying they will be worse off seems surprisingly high - but it is declining, as you say.</p>
<p>I think the message from the iR polls is that people do care a great deal about a law that threatens their relatives or friends or their sense of &#8216;fairness&#8217; - even when they themselves do not expect to be worse off. It could affect their vote - unless Howard can convince them that their jobs are at risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Norton</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2007/03/campaigns-versus-personal-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-6237</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2007/03/26/campaigns-versus-personal-experience/#comment-6237</guid>
		<description>Russell - Real wages dropping during recessions is not a bad thing in a macroeconomic sense, since that will help limit the increase in unemployment. But of course the individuals involved may not see it that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russell - Real wages dropping during recessions is not a bad thing in a macroeconomic sense, since that will help limit the increase in unemployment. But of course the individuals involved may not see it that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2007/03/campaigns-versus-personal-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-6239</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2007/03/26/campaigns-versus-personal-experience/#comment-6239</guid>
		<description>"people can decide for themselves from their general experience" - and pity those under 30 who've never seen a recession. Perhaps it's they who are feeling increasingly relaxed and comfortable with Workchoices. The lesson is ahead of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;people can decide for themselves from their general experience&#8221; - and pity those under 30 who&#8217;ve never seen a recession. Perhaps it&#8217;s they who are feeling increasingly relaxed and comfortable with Workchoices. The lesson is ahead of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
