<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paddy McGuinness, RIP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewnorton.info/2008/01/paddy-mcguinness-rip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/01/paddy-mcguinness-rip/</link>
	<description>Observations from Carlton's Lone Classical Liberal</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: marcelproust</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/01/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11556</link>
		<dc:creator>marcelproust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/01/27/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11556</guid>
		<description>Clancy, condolences, but how exactly was it possible to have a scholarship at SBH?  Wasn't it free to all, albeit selective?

And AN, I agree that true neocons in Australia are rare, but hangers on of the now passing Bushite Howard ascendancy filled some of the same roles, and in some ways were neocons manque.

Interesting that Hayden and PPMcG both had the same path of apostasy (that's the kinder term) from the left.  Hayden really seems to have turned into a poor man's Sir John Kerr on that front.  Becoming G-G did for him, I fear.  I wonder if it was sycophancy from "Sir" Sir David Smith that did it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clancy, condolences, but how exactly was it possible to have a scholarship at SBH?  Wasn&#8217;t it free to all, albeit selective?</p>
<p>And AN, I agree that true neocons in Australia are rare, but hangers on of the now passing Bushite Howard ascendancy filled some of the same roles, and in some ways were neocons manque.</p>
<p>Interesting that Hayden and PPMcG both had the same path of apostasy (that&#8217;s the kinder term) from the left.  Hayden really seems to have turned into a poor man&#8217;s Sir John Kerr on that front.  Becoming G-G did for him, I fear.  I wonder if it was sycophancy from &#8220;Sir&#8221; Sir David Smith that did it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monaro</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/01/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11551</link>
		<dc:creator>monaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/01/27/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11551</guid>
		<description>This would be the same Paul Keating who, a day or so earlier, paid his respects to a monster:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Communists, red sympathisers and their families are being massacred by the thousands. Backlands army units are reported to have executed thousands of communists after interrogation in remote jails. Armed with wide-bladed knives called parangs, Moslem bands crept at night into the homes of communists, killing entire families and burying their bodies in shallow graves. The murder campaign became so brazen in parts of rural East Java, that Moslem bands placed the heads of victims on poles and paraded them through villages. The killings have been on such a scale that the disposal of the corpses has created a serious sanitation problem in East Java and Northern Sumatra where the humid air bears the reek of decaying flesh. Travellers from those areas tell of small rivers and streams that have been literally clogged with bodies.

&lt;i&gt;—Time Magazine, December 1965&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
But in Keating’s diseased mind, Paddy’s criticism, or anyone else’s, was a far greater crime than a million murders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would be the same Paul Keating who, a day or so earlier, paid his respects to a monster:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Communists, red sympathisers and their families are being massacred by the thousands. Backlands army units are reported to have executed thousands of communists after interrogation in remote jails. Armed with wide-bladed knives called parangs, Moslem bands crept at night into the homes of communists, killing entire families and burying their bodies in shallow graves. The murder campaign became so brazen in parts of rural East Java, that Moslem bands placed the heads of victims on poles and paraded them through villages. The killings have been on such a scale that the disposal of the corpses has created a serious sanitation problem in East Java and Northern Sumatra where the humid air bears the reek of decaying flesh. Travellers from those areas tell of small rivers and streams that have been literally clogged with bodies.</p>
<p><i>—Time Magazine, December 1965</i>
</p></blockquote>
<p>But in Keating’s diseased mind, Paddy’s criticism, or anyone else’s, was a far greater crime than a million murders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Norton</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/01/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11550</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/01/27/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11550</guid>
		<description>The distinctive feature of the neocons - what separates them from realists etc - is their belief in spreading democracy. I agree that this had little to do with the original rationale for invading Iraq. None of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld or Rice are neocons, though of course they were cheered on by neocons who had their own reasons for wanting Saddam gone (though once a dictatorship has been deposed, realists from democratic countries would presumably usually prefer a democracy replace it).

Iraq was invaded because the American leadership (wrongly, as it turned out) believed that this would serve US national interests. It is the same basic reason that invasions have occurred for thousands of years, and will in all likelihood occur for thousands of years more.

So you made a specific claim that the previous government's actions were inspired by a particular ideology. I think this is plainly false. The previous government had no neocons, and even if they did outsourcing refugee detention to a country that was willng to do it (and is now complaining that we are stopping) had nothing to do with it.

If you want to argue that the previous government was essentially driven by traditional foreign policy realism I will agree with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The distinctive feature of the neocons - what separates them from realists etc - is their belief in spreading democracy. I agree that this had little to do with the original rationale for invading Iraq. None of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld or Rice are neocons, though of course they were cheered on by neocons who had their own reasons for wanting Saddam gone (though once a dictatorship has been deposed, realists from democratic countries would presumably usually prefer a democracy replace it).</p>
<p>Iraq was invaded because the American leadership (wrongly, as it turned out) believed that this would serve US national interests. It is the same basic reason that invasions have occurred for thousands of years, and will in all likelihood occur for thousands of years more.</p>
<p>So you made a specific claim that the previous government&#8217;s actions were inspired by a particular ideology. I think this is plainly false. The previous government had no neocons, and even if they did outsourcing refugee detention to a country that was willng to do it (and is now complaining that we are stopping) had nothing to do with it.</p>
<p>If you want to argue that the previous government was essentially driven by traditional foreign policy realism I will agree with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiros</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/01/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11543</link>
		<dc:creator>Spiros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/01/27/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11543</guid>
		<description>Andrew, don't change the subject, which is whether there are neo cons in Australia. Howard and Downer, especially Downer, only started behaving like neo cons after George and Condi showed them how.

The migration racket could have been shut down without bullying Nauru, a bankrupt state that is entirely dependent on our good graces for its survival, and so open to be pushed around, even by the likes of Alexander Downer.

And, really, are you so naive as to believe that the neo con agenda was really about spreading democracy around the world? It was about the projection of American power. The stuff about democracy was a pretext, to distinguish it from the Kissinger realist school of American foreign policy power, which did not bother with pretexts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, don&#8217;t change the subject, which is whether there are neo cons in Australia. Howard and Downer, especially Downer, only started behaving like neo cons after George and Condi showed them how.</p>
<p>The migration racket could have been shut down without bullying Nauru, a bankrupt state that is entirely dependent on our good graces for its survival, and so open to be pushed around, even by the likes of Alexander Downer.</p>
<p>And, really, are you so naive as to believe that the neo con agenda was really about spreading democracy around the world? It was about the projection of American power. The stuff about democracy was a pretext, to distinguish it from the Kissinger realist school of American foreign policy power, which did not bother with pretexts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Norton</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/01/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11544</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/01/27/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11544</guid>
		<description>Er, Spiros, I think you will find that countries throwing their weight around started rather before late 20th century American intellectuals started arguing for an invasion of Iraq.

And what does shutting down a migration racket operating via refugee law have to do with spreading democracy around the world?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, Spiros, I think you will find that countries throwing their weight around started rather before late 20th century American intellectuals started arguing for an invasion of Iraq.</p>
<p>And what does shutting down a migration racket operating via refugee law have to do with spreading democracy around the world?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bring Back CL's blog</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/01/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11549</link>
		<dc:creator>Bring Back CL's blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/01/27/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11549</guid>
		<description>Carr and Keating were similar in intent except of course Keating went for the jugular.

Paddy never liked Keating from the time Keating knew more on a subject Paddy should have been an expert on and showed him up terribly.

Paddy couldn't get over the fact a person who never even got the HSC was not only more knowledgable but understood the subject better than he a person of honours and masters degree background.

It got ridiculous at one stage when at some pub in Balmain he became totaly inarticulate about why Keating was one of the worst PMs ever.

As more and more people heckled about labour marker deregulation, competition policy etc Paddy got redder and redder. I thought he would burst.

it is ironic he was friends with Hayden yet the man who he might have enjoyed an intellectual conversation with he hated with a vehemance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carr and Keating were similar in intent except of course Keating went for the jugular.</p>
<p>Paddy never liked Keating from the time Keating knew more on a subject Paddy should have been an expert on and showed him up terribly.</p>
<p>Paddy couldn&#8217;t get over the fact a person who never even got the HSC was not only more knowledgable but understood the subject better than he a person of honours and masters degree background.</p>
<p>It got ridiculous at one stage when at some pub in Balmain he became totaly inarticulate about why Keating was one of the worst PMs ever.</p>
<p>As more and more people heckled about labour marker deregulation, competition policy etc Paddy got redder and redder. I thought he would burst.</p>
<p>it is ironic he was friends with Hayden yet the man who he might have enjoyed an intellectual conversation with he hated with a vehemance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiros</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/01/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11548</link>
		<dc:creator>Spiros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/01/27/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11548</guid>
		<description>"there are no ‘neocons’ in Australia"

I'm not so sure. The leitmotif of the American neo cons is an aggressive insistence that the United States to throw its weight about, when and where they feel like it. Obviously, Australia's capacity to do this is much more limited. But the Howard government certainly did it on occasion, most notably bullying the government of Nauru into taking our refugees, intervening in the Solomons, and so on. All of this occurred after the neo cons had taken power in the US and had showed them how to do it.

Back to McGuinness, the point still stands. Substitute "tories" for "neo cons" if you must.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;there are no ‘neocons’ in Australia&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not so sure. The leitmotif of the American neo cons is an aggressive insistence that the United States to throw its weight about, when and where they feel like it. Obviously, Australia&#8217;s capacity to do this is much more limited. But the Howard government certainly did it on occasion, most notably bullying the government of Nauru into taking our refugees, intervening in the Solomons, and so on. All of this occurred after the neo cons had taken power in the US and had showed them how to do it.</p>
<p>Back to McGuinness, the point still stands. Substitute &#8220;tories&#8221; for &#8220;neo cons&#8221; if you must.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Norton</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/01/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11558</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/01/27/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11558</guid>
		<description>Except that there are no 'neocons' in Australia. It's a distinctively American thing (see&lt;a href="http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/01/31/chameleon-conservatives/" rel="nofollow"&gt; last night's post&lt;/a&gt;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that there are no &#8216;neocons&#8217; in Australia. It&#8217;s a distinctively American thing (see<a href="http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/01/31/chameleon-conservatives/" rel="nofollow"> last night&#8217;s post</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiros</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/01/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11542</link>
		<dc:creator>Spiros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/01/27/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11542</guid>
		<description>Keating only got one thing wrong. He said McGuinness became a neo con. He didn't. He became a whore to the neo cons, flattering them and being flattered in turn, which is much worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keating only got one thing wrong. He said McGuinness became a neo con. He didn&#8217;t. He became a whore to the neo cons, flattering them and being flattered in turn, which is much worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafe</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/01/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11546</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/01/27/paddy-mcguinness-rip/#comment-11546</guid>
		<description>It was not deserved. It is not necessary to agree with Paddy on everything to accept that he was neither a liar nor a fraud. Keating put his feet firmly in the gutter with that piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was not deserved. It is not necessary to agree with Paddy on everything to accept that he was neither a liar nor a fraud. Keating put his feet firmly in the gutter with that piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
