<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Changing minds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewnorton.info/2008/03/changing-minds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/03/changing-minds/</link>
	<description>Observations from Carlton's Lone Classical Liberal</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 23:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CoreEcon &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2020 Homework</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/03/changing-minds/#comment-12536</link>
		<dc:creator>CoreEcon &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2020 Homework</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 03:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/03/31/changing-minds/#comment-12536</guid>
		<description>[...] have to thank Andrew Norton for reading the instructions to 2020 participants carefully. Buried in them was a bit of homework [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have to thank Andrew Norton for reading the instructions to 2020 participants carefully. Buried in them was a bit of homework [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Norton</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/03/changing-minds/#comment-12548</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 04:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/03/31/changing-minds/#comment-12548</guid>
		<description>"From reading your blog, you seem best as a good communicator of existing ideas in a generally intelligent and thoughtful way."

Pete - It depends what you mean by 'existing ideas'. The broad intellectual framework I work from is far from original. But I apply it in contexts that other people do not. I'm the only higher education policy specialist from a market perspective, and indeed one of a very small number of people who write about higher education from any expertise-based perspective. I presume that's the main reason I was invited to 2020.

Similarly, I don't collect original data. But I do report lots of data that is unreported or unanalysed elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;From reading your blog, you seem best as a good communicator of existing ideas in a generally intelligent and thoughtful way.&#8221;</p>
<p>Pete - It depends what you mean by &#8216;existing ideas&#8217;. The broad intellectual framework I work from is far from original. But I apply it in contexts that other people do not. I&#8217;m the only higher education policy specialist from a market perspective, and indeed one of a very small number of people who write about higher education from any expertise-based perspective. I presume that&#8217;s the main reason I was invited to 2020.</p>
<p>Similarly, I don&#8217;t collect original data. But I do report lots of data that is unreported or unanalysed elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete from Perth</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/03/changing-minds/#comment-12535</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete from Perth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/03/31/changing-minds/#comment-12535</guid>
		<description>Andrew, congratulations on your selection.

(I'm a bit surprised though. From reading your blog, you seem best as a good communicator of existing ideas in a generally intelligent and thoughtful way. Sort of like a thinking man's Paddy McGuinness. We don't always agree, but, you're able to put up well defined reasons for your opinions.)

If there's one thing you can do, try to make sure that each participant puts a view of something outside their usual comfort zone. That's the only way the forum will generate any genuinely new, fresh ideas. Otherwise, it'll just be the usual talkfest with the same old topics and the same old end results.

Best of luck with the Summit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, congratulations on your selection.</p>
<p>(I&#8217;m a bit surprised though. From reading your blog, you seem best as a good communicator of existing ideas in a generally intelligent and thoughtful way. Sort of like a thinking man&#8217;s Paddy McGuinness. We don&#8217;t always agree, but, you&#8217;re able to put up well defined reasons for your opinions.)</p>
<p>If there&#8217;s one thing you can do, try to make sure that each participant puts a view of something outside their usual comfort zone. That&#8217;s the only way the forum will generate any genuinely new, fresh ideas. Otherwise, it&#8217;ll just be the usual talkfest with the same old topics and the same old end results.</p>
<p>Best of luck with the Summit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/03/changing-minds/#comment-12550</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/03/31/changing-minds/#comment-12550</guid>
		<description>As Oliver Wendell Holmes once said, “It seems to me that at this time we need education in the obvious more than the investigation of the obscure.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Oliver Wendell Holmes once said, “It seems to me that at this time we need education in the obvious more than the investigation of the obscure.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/03/changing-minds/#comment-12549</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/03/31/changing-minds/#comment-12549</guid>
		<description>The economics of &lt;a href="http://www.hhs.se/NR/rdonlyres/17934A56-0D24-444E-89C9-0BE607DA03D5/0/AERCaillaudTirolejan12071.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;Consensus building: How to persuade a group&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The economics of <a href="http://www.hhs.se/NR/rdonlyres/17934A56-0D24-444E-89C9-0BE607DA03D5/0/AERCaillaudTirolejan12071.pdf" rel="nofollow">Consensus building: How to persuade a group</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Norton</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/03/changing-minds/#comment-12534</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/03/31/changing-minds/#comment-12534</guid>
		<description>Sukrit - Even as a participant, I only have a vague idea about how this weekend in Canberra will operate. But I can't see the logic in inviting only Nobel prize winners or other prizes, when the most important ideas in economics aren't the innovations which win people Nobel prizes, but the basic concepts and methods every economics undergraduate learns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sukrit - Even as a participant, I only have a vague idea about how this weekend in Canberra will operate. But I can&#8217;t see the logic in inviting only Nobel prize winners or other prizes, when the most important ideas in economics aren&#8217;t the innovations which win people Nobel prizes, but the basic concepts and methods every economics undergraduate learns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiros</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/03/changing-minds/#comment-12533</link>
		<dc:creator>Spiros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/03/31/changing-minds/#comment-12533</guid>
		<description>JC, I once thought at least 5% of your posts would be worth reading. I was wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JC, I once thought at least 5% of your posts would be worth reading. I was wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sukrit</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/03/changing-minds/#comment-12532</link>
		<dc:creator>Sukrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/03/31/changing-minds/#comment-12532</guid>
		<description>Australia's best and brightest should have been measured objectively, and it shouldn't have been an arbitrary number like 1000.

For example, since there no Australian economists who have won the Nobel Prize, there should have been no economists invited (or, if there are non-government prizes in Australia for economists, only the winners of &lt;i&gt;those&lt;/i&gt; prizes should have been invited).

Using objective non-government measures will wittle down the list of 'best and brightest' to a more accurate number of 100. These sort of talkfests should at least be realistic about the intellectual talent in Australia as compared to the powerhouses in the UK, US and rest of the world.

And why are so many politicians invited? I'm generalising, but most politicians know how to speak well and build coalitions by compromising their principles for votes... but  that doesn't mean they know how to fix Australia's problems. And besides, they get enough airtime for their ideas already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australia&#8217;s best and brightest should have been measured objectively, and it shouldn&#8217;t have been an arbitrary number like 1000.</p>
<p>For example, since there no Australian economists who have won the Nobel Prize, there should have been no economists invited (or, if there are non-government prizes in Australia for economists, only the winners of <i>those</i> prizes should have been invited).</p>
<p>Using objective non-government measures will wittle down the list of &#8216;best and brightest&#8217; to a more accurate number of 100. These sort of talkfests should at least be realistic about the intellectual talent in Australia as compared to the powerhouses in the UK, US and rest of the world.</p>
<p>And why are so many politicians invited? I&#8217;m generalising, but most politicians know how to speak well and build coalitions by compromising their principles for votes&#8230; but  that doesn&#8217;t mean they know how to fix Australia&#8217;s problems. And besides, they get enough airtime for their ideas already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/03/changing-minds/#comment-12531</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 03:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/03/31/changing-minds/#comment-12531</guid>
		<description>Spiros says:

"But it’s good that people admit they are wrong, when they are shown to be wrong."

Yea, but we've been waiting for your admission for years, Spiros.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spiros says:</p>
<p>&#8220;But it’s good that people admit they are wrong, when they are shown to be wrong.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yea, but we&#8217;ve been waiting for your admission for years, Spiros.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conrad</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/03/changing-minds/#comment-12530</link>
		<dc:creator>conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 02:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2008/03/31/changing-minds/#comment-12530</guid>
		<description>At least for question 2, the following might do for a bit of inspiration about what other people admit they got wrong:

http://www.edge.org/q2008/q08_1.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least for question 2, the following might do for a bit of inspiration about what other people admit they got wrong:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.edge.org/q2008/q08_1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.edge.org/q2008/q08_1.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
