<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should companies impose fuel surcharges?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewnorton.info/2008/07/should-companies-impose-fuel-surcharges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/07/should-companies-impose-fuel-surcharges/</link>
	<description>Observations from Carlton's Lone Classical Liberal</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: airline</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/07/should-companies-impose-fuel-surcharges/#comment-54419</link>
		<dc:creator>airline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/?p=506#comment-54419</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;airline...&lt;/strong&gt;

airline...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>airline&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>airline&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajat Sood</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/07/should-companies-impose-fuel-surcharges/#comment-18270</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajat Sood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/?p=506#comment-18270</guid>
		<description>The international flights I am about to book were more expensive that the alternative "before taxes and charges" but cheaper overall. I think these levies are a sales tactic in two ways. First, consumers probably assume levies are similar amongst suppliers and hence are willing to go for the lowest pre-levy price. Yet, ironically, quoting levies separately is only informative if they differ between suppliers (cf GST). Second, they soften up consumers to pay higher prices because consumers are made to feel that prices are going up due to unavoidable cost increases rather than simply because demand exceeds supply. The community seems to think there is something deeply immoral about setting prices above costs (except for Australian minerals exports), even though this is an essential signalling mechanism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The international flights I am about to book were more expensive that the alternative &#8220;before taxes and charges&#8221; but cheaper overall. I think these levies are a sales tactic in two ways. First, consumers probably assume levies are similar amongst suppliers and hence are willing to go for the lowest pre-levy price. Yet, ironically, quoting levies separately is only informative if they differ between suppliers (cf GST). Second, they soften up consumers to pay higher prices because consumers are made to feel that prices are going up due to unavoidable cost increases rather than simply because demand exceeds supply. The community seems to think there is something deeply immoral about setting prices above costs (except for Australian minerals exports), even though this is an essential signalling mechanism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoreEcon &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fuel surcharges</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/07/should-companies-impose-fuel-surcharges/#comment-18266</link>
		<dc:creator>CoreEcon &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fuel surcharges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 22:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/?p=506#comment-18266</guid>
		<description>[...] Norton looks at the introduction of fuel surcharges. It started with airlines but that was all about stopping travel agents from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Norton looks at the introduction of fuel surcharges. It started with airlines but that was all about stopping travel agents from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
