<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The problem of Ministerial discretion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewnorton.info/2008/07/the-problem-of-ministerial-discretion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/07/the-problem-of-ministerial-discretion/</link>
	<description>Observations from Carlton's Lone Classical Liberal</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rafe Champion</title>
		<link>http://andrewnorton.info/2008/07/the-problem-of-ministerial-discretion/#comment-18791</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafe Champion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 22:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewnorton.info/?p=508#comment-18791</guid>
		<description>Ministerial discretion is a loaded gun pointed at the heart of democracy. Hayek and Popper picked this up under the heading of "rules versus orders", with the argument that rules should be put in place to achieve objectives with a degree of transparency, instead of trying to get results from Ministerial edicts and directions which result in unpredictability and (often well founded) conspiracy theories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ministerial discretion is a loaded gun pointed at the heart of democracy. Hayek and Popper picked this up under the heading of &#8220;rules versus orders&#8221;, with the argument that rules should be put in place to achieve objectives with a degree of transparency, instead of trying to get results from Ministerial edicts and directions which result in unpredictability and (often well founded) conspiracy theories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
