Many people, on this blog and elsewhere, think that the David Jones sexual harassment case is commercially dangerous for the company:
The case will definitely have an effect on the DJs brand in the long term, leading brand analyst Richard Sauerman of Brand Alchemy said. …
But Mr Sauerman said he expected some women would show how they felt about the sexual harassment allegations by shopping elsewhere.
He said once this sentiment grew it could have an effect on the company’s bottom line, and then even its share price.
And indeed social attitudes surveys show that this kind of consumer behaviour takes place. The ABS General Social Survey 2006 found that over a twelve months period a quarter of those surveyed had ‘boycotted or deliberately bought products for political, ethical or environmental reasons’.
On the other hand this isn’t the first time in recent years that David Jones has been accused of sexual impropriety. In 2006 the Australia Institute accused it of ‘corporate paedophilia’ because David Jones allegedly used sexualised images of children in its clothing catalogues. Continue reading “Will the David Jones harassment case be bad for business?”